The Bosporus and Dardanelles straits as one of the main vulnerable points in Russian Empire’s external politics

The wars were fought over control of the Black Sea region and the straits, and they highlighted the strategic importance of the region for Russia's foreign policy. The vulnerability of the straits also played a significant role in shaping Russia's foreign policy towards the Black Sea region in the 20th century. The closure of the straits during World War I highlighted the vulnerability of Russia's external politics and forced it to shift its foreign policy towards the east, as it sought to gain access to warm-water ports through China and Japan. Following the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, the Soviet Union continued Russia's expansionist ambitions in the Black Sea region. It sought to establish control over the region and gain access to warm-water ports, leading to a series of conflicts with neighboring states. The Soviet Union established a naval base in Sevastopol in Crimea, which became a major strategic asset for the Soviet navy during the Cold War.For the Ottoman Empire, the successful defense of the straits was a significant victory, which bolstered their confidence and contributed to their continued participation in the war on the side of Germany and Austria-Hungary.In conclusion, the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits were a crucial strategic location during World War I, with their control playing a significant role in the war effort. The failure of the Gallipoli Campaign had far-reaching consequences, contributing to the collapse of the Russian army and the eventual outcome of the war.Impact of the Bosporus and Dardanelles on Russian foreign policyThe Bosporus and Dardanelles straits have had a significant impact on Russian foreign policy, particularly in relation to the Black Sea region. The straits are a critical link between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean, providing access to warm-water ports and trade routes. Their control has been a key issue for the great powers of the region, including the Ottoman Empire, the Russian Empire, and various European states[3]. Russia’s interest in the Bosporus and Dardanelles dates back to the 18th century when it began expanding towards the Black Sea region. The Russian Empire’s expansion was driven by its desire to gain access to warm-water ports and establish control over the Black Sea. The conflict between the Russian and Ottoman Empires over the control of the straits led to a series of Russo-Turkish wars in the 18th and 19th centuries. During World War I, the closure of the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits had a significant impact on Russia’s military and economic position in the region. The lack of access to warm-water ports and trade routes weakened Russia’s economy and limited its ability to provide support to its allies[10]. The closure of the straits highlighted the vulnerability of Russia’s external politics and led to a shift in its foreign policy towards the east. After World War I, the Soviet Union, the successor state to the Russian Empire, sought to establish its influence in the Black Sea region. The Soviet Union’s efforts to gain control of the straits were part of its broader geopolitical strategy to establish itself as a major power in the region. The Soviet Union established naval bases in the Black Sea, including in Sevastopol and Odessa, which provided it with a strategic presence in the region. In the post-Soviet era, Russia has continued to view the Black Sea region as a critical part of its foreign policy. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 was in part a response to Russia’s concerns about its strategic position in the region. Russia’s ongoing involvement in the conflict in eastern Ukraine is also related to its efforts to maintain its influence in the Black Sea region. In conclusion, the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits have had a significant impact on Russian foreign policy, shaping its expansion towards the Black Sea region and its efforts to gain access to warm-water ports and establish control over the Black Sea. The closure of the straits during World War I highlighted the vulnerability of Russia’s external politics and led to a shift in its foreign policy towards the east. The control of the straits remains a critical issue for Russia’s foreign policy in the Black Sea region.ConclusionIn conclusion, the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits were a critical vulnerability for the Russian Empire’s external politics. Russia’s expansion towards the Black Sea region was driven by its desire to gain access to warm-water ports and establish control over the Black Sea. The conflict between the Russian and Ottoman Empires over the control of the straits led to a series of Russo-Turkish wars in the 18th and 19th centuries. The closure of the straits during World War I weakened Russia’s military and economic position in the region, highlighting its vulnerability to external pressures.The vulnerability of the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits played a significant role in shaping Russia’s foreign policy towards the east, as it sought to gain access to warm-water ports through China and Japan. This shift in Russia’s foreign policy was a result of its inability to secure its position in the Black Sea region due to the vulnerability of the straits.The significance of the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits as one of the main vulnerable points in Russian Empire’s external politics is evident from the impact of their closure during World War I. The closure weakened Russia’s position in the region and highlighted the need for a more robust and sustainable foreign policy.In modern times, the straits remain a critical geopolitical location, with their control being a key issue for Turkey, Russia, and other regional and global powers. The importance of the straits in the Eastern Mediterranean and their vulnerability to external pressures make them a key strategic location, with their control remaining a significant issue in the region’s geopolitical landscape.Thus, the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits were a critical vulnerability for the Russian Empire’s external politics, with their closure during World War I highlighting the need for a more robust and sustainable foreign policy. The significance of the straits in the region’s geopolitical landscape remains to this day, with their control remaining a key issue for Turkey, Russia, and other regional and global powers.List of sourcesEsmer, Ahmed Sükrü. «The Straits: Crux of World Politics.» Foreign Affairs Vol. 25, No. 2 (Jan., 1947): 290-302. https://doi.org/10.2307/20030040 (accessed April 18, 2023).Council for Economic Education. «A Fire Waiting to Be Lit: The Origins of World War I.» CRF-USA. Accessed April 18, 2023. https://www.crf-usa.org/resources/a-fire-waiting-to-be-lit-the-origins-of-world-war-i (accessed April 18, 2023).Congressional Quarterly Researcher. «The Great Powers and the Dardanelles.» CQ Researcher. Accessed April 18, 2023. https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1944092600 (accessed April 18, 2023).LaGrone, Sam. «Turkey Closes Bosphorus, Dardanelles Straits to Warships.» USNI News. 28 Feb 2022. Accessed April 18, 2023. https://news.usni.org/2022/02/28/turkey-closes-bosphorus-dardanelles-straits-to-warships (accessed April 18, 2023).Ercan, Hakan. «The Question of the Straits and the Soviet Foreign Policy.» CORE. Accessed April 18, 2023. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236119033.pdf (accessed April 18, 2023).Zimmerer, Jürgen. «War Aims and War Aims Discussions (Russian Empire).» 1914-1918 Online. Accessed April 18, 2023. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/war_aims_and_war_aims_discussions_russian_empire (accessed April 18, 2023).Çakmak, Hüseyin. «The Turkish Straits: History, Politics, and Strategic Dilemmas.»Oriente Moderno 28, no. 1 (2008): 58-77. https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-02801003 (accessed April 18, 2023).Keskin, Mustafa. «THE BACKGROUND OF RUSSIA'S CLAIMS TO THE TURKISH STRAITS.»TürkTarihKurumu. Accessed April 18, 2023. https://belleten.gov.tr/tam-metin-pdf/3187/eng (accessed April 18, 2023).Bal, İbrahim. «Ankara to Black Sea: Turkey and Russia’s Age-Old Struggle for Regional Supremacy.» Foreign Affairs. May 12, 2014. Accessed April 18, 2023. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/turkey/2014-05-12/ankara-black-sea (accessed April 18, 2023).Nilsson-Wright, John, and Adrien Morin. «Deep Dive in the Black Sea: Turkey’s Role and Potential in the Region.» Marshall Center. Accessed April 18, 2023. https://www.marshallcenter.org/en/publications/clock-tower-security-series/deep-dive-black-sea-turkeys-role-and-potential-region/deep-dive-black-sea-turkeys-role-and-potential-region (accessed April 18, 2023).